![](\"https:\/\/www.michaelgracemartin.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/red_swing_76.jpg\"\n)
<\/a>\nVisit Michael's
","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If you follow this blog at all, you know I recently purchased a Canon 35-350 L zoom lens for use …<\/p>\n
If you follow this blog at all, you know I recently purchased a Canon 35-350 L zoom lens for use with my full-frame Canon 5D. The 35-350 L is no longer manufactured by Canon; it’s been replaced by the 28-300 IS L. But you can still get a 35-350 L in great condition (around $1100), and they’re only about half the cost of the 28-300 IS L (around $2200).<\/p>\n
The 35-350 has turned out to be a great lens for me on a full-frame camera. I’m still blown away by the fact that this lens has the farthest reach of any of my lenses, yet includes a respectable wide angle focal length of 35mm. It would be nice if it had a constant maximum aperture of f\/2.8 throughout the zoom range (rather than f\/3.5 – f\/5.6), but then it would be unbelievably heavy, I’m sure!<\/p>\n
Anyway, 35mm on a full-frame DSLR meets, probably, 90% of my wide angle needs. But every once in a while, I want to be able to reach 28mm, 24mm, or even a little wider. Now, granted, my desire for 28mm or wider is usually an indoor phenomenon. However, there are situations outdoors (e.g., next to a tall waterfall) or semi-outdoors (e.g., on a open boat for a cocktail cruise) where I could use some “serious” wide angle capability.<\/p>\n
Well, it turns out I own a Canon 17-40 f\/4 L lens<\/a> which gives me true wide angle coverage to 17mm on my 5D. I don’t use this lens a lot; but when I need it, it *really* comes in handy. (New 17-40 f\/4 L lenses<\/a> can be purchased for around $700.)<\/p>\n I’ve got a *mostly* outdoor wedding coming up (some of the reception will take place inside an actual building; otherwise–weather permitting–everything else is going to be outdoors), and it occurred to me that with my 35-350 on one 5D and my 17-40 on the other 5D, I’ve got an awesome focal range of 17-350mm using professional Canon L zoom lenses! Total lens cost: $1800.<\/p>\n Now, matching the Canon 16-35 f\/2.8 L<\/a> with the 35-350 would also work (and pick up another 1mm on the wide end), but a new 16-35 f\/2.8 L<\/a> is about twice the cost of the 17-40 (about $1400). The total lens cost of uniting the 35-350 with the 16-35 f\/2.8 would be $2500.<\/p>\n Of course, you could buy just the 28-300 IS L for $2200 and only have to deal with one camera and lens. However, you would be cutting off some of your coverage range at *both* the wide and telephoto ends (you would lose 16-28mm or 17-28mm and 300-350mm). You’d also miss out on the nice added capabilities of having an ultra wide-angle zoom, which can really come in handy.<\/p>\n Because the 35-350 is a bit slow aperture-wise (f\/3.5 – f\/5.6) and reaches 350mm (total overkill for most indoor situations), I would never recommend it as a good indoor lens for weddings. However, combined with the 17-40 f\/4 L, you’ve really got an amazing outdoor wedding lens combo for $1800 or less (if you can get some good used lens deals), that could capture practically any shot you could throw at it! (Note: For you bokeh lovers…even with the relatively small maximum apertures of the 35-350, you can get some really nice bokeh in a large portion of the telephoto range: 150-350mm.)<\/p>\n
\n